Showing posts with label business factors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label business factors. Show all posts

Saturday, September 15, 2007

DATA CENTERS, PART-4

Real-world
Downtime for each Tier

This was taken inside a rented cage inside a data center. This is a colocation site.

This is Part-4. Click here to read Part-1. A new tab or window will open.

“Uptime” refers to the end-user's uninterrupted access to his or her data. “Downtime” refers to any disruption to this access.

Both uptime and downtime are measured from the end-user perspective. Downtime, for example, is measured from the start to the end of the disruption. Downtime is always longer than the period of the actual disruption. This is due to the aftereffects that occur downstream of the point of disruption. Let's say a Tier-2 center experienced a power outage for 30 seconds. Database servers in the middle of multiple transactions would suddenly die. The database would probably not get corrupted thanks to the built-in safeguards of the database application. Still, it'll take time for the database administrators to confirm this. Assuming the best, end-user access will be restored.

These empirical statistics came from a control group of 16 data centers studied by
The Uptime Institute, the creators of the Tier standard.

Tier-1 centers typically experience two separate 12-hour periods of downtime a year because of preventive maintenance. These sites also experience 1.2 failures a year of its components or paths. Tier-1 centers average 28.8 hours of downtime a year (equivalent to 99.67% uptime).

Tier-2 sites typically experience three scheduled maintenance periods every two years and one unexpected outage each year. Tier-2 centers average 22 hours of downtime a year (equivalent to 99.75% uptime).

Tier-3 centers typically experience four hours of downtime every two and a half years—or 1.6 hours a year (equivalent to 99.98% uptime).

Tier-4 sites typically experience four hours of downtime every five years—or 50 minutes a year (equivalent to 99.99% uptime).

So far, we know these factors will cause unexpected disruptions:
  1. Human activities
  2. Infrastructure and equipment failures
  3. Acts of God

The human factor


I encountered another factor that will definitely cause a center to shut down. Local authorities. Local fire and electrical safety codes may force sites, regardless of tier, to shut down for inspections and tests. Fortunately, these can be planned events.

How long does it typically take to restore access from momentary disruptions? Four hours. Tier level aside, a disruption will require human intervention. That alone takes time. Would you agree that four hours seem quick for Tier-1 and -2 but, at the same time, seem too long for Tier-3 and -4? It's about expectations, isn't it?

The higher tiers, -3 and –4, should be built and, more importantly, operated with the capability to withstand subsequent failures triggered by the first failure event. "Failure" should be interpreted broadly as you will see from these customer examples.

The first involved a Tier-3 center normally staffed by two operators. O
ne of them was on extended leave. One morning, the remaining person called in sick. How did they deal with it? The manager spent the day there. She wasn't trained but fortunately nothing untoward happened.

The second occurred in an Tier-2 room. A
cooling pipe beneath the raised floor had sprung a leak. It went undetected for a week until a floor tile was picked up for another reason. A rather wide puddle had formed in the sub-floor. The site had no operators per se. The analysts, programmers, and managers had to deal with it. It was discovered mid-morning and was not was resolved until close to midnight. Nobody was really responsible for the physical infrastructure and, consequently, nobody was trained.

Facility failures often reveal previously unknown architectural, hardware, or software issues. As you read however, more than anything else, disruptions expose human activity-related deficiencies. You have to train and practice and fill the roles properly otherwise the human factor will get you.


Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

BUSINESS FACTORS THAT DETERMINE TIER SELECTION

A guide to making an appropriate business decision on an important investment.


In an earlier post, I discussed how and how important it is for Data Centers to be classified. Click here to read it. A new tab or window will open.

In this post, I'll discuss criteria for determining tier selection. I hope you find it useful. As always, I welcome your feedback.

Tier-1 and –2 are typically built to meet short-term requirements. Cost and speed of implementation override uptime (i.e., availability) and life cycle requirements.

Tier-3 and –4 are strategic investments that emphasize uptime and long-term viability. These centers have a much longer useful lifetime than its end-user equipment. These centers liberate the company to make strategic business decisions concerning growth and technology. A transportation company can expand its operations across the country knowing that every regional office it establishes is backed up by its Tier-4 infrastructure.

Tier-1 is appropriate for:
  1. firms where IT only enhances internal operations. The firm can continue to run for an extended period without IT presence
  2. businesses that don’t anticipate a severe financial impact from prolonged downtime
  3. companies that plan to abandon the center when their IT requirements increase.
Tier-2 is appropriate for:
  1. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that don’t guarantee their clients a high uptime rate in their Service Level Agreement (SLA)
  2. firms whose IT requirements are mostly limited to standard business hours, e.g., Monday to Friday from 8 to 5. The Data Center can schedule its maintenance schedule around these hours.
  3. institutional or educational organizations that won’t suffer meaningful impact (libraries or schools)businesses on a tight budget that want to store their data off-site (electronic vaulting). A smart strategy for them is to plan to take their chances with Tier-2 only temporarily. They should plan and budget to switch after a planned and limited duration (months instead of years) firms that plan to abandon the center when their IT requirements increase.












Tier-3 is appropriate for:
  1. companies that require IT services to support mission-critical processes and can tolerate short (less than 12 to 18 hours) outages (e.g., hospitals)
  2. firms that have high-availability requirements and are willing to accept the financial impact of unexpected downtime
  3. companies that designed their Tier-3 sites to be upgraded to Tier-4.
Tier-4 is justified for:
  1. large companies in highly competitive industries
  2. organizations that require 24/7 uptime due to laws and regulations (e.g., banks and financial services)
  3. internet-based businesses that derive their revenue from e-commerce 24/7


Reference: The Uptime Institute


Sphere: Related Content